Showing posts with label TV shows. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TV shows. Show all posts
Saturday, June 11, 2011
Funniest T.V Moment of the Week
I don't care what side of the political fence you are on, this was one hilarious segment!
Thursday, June 9, 2011
State of Entertainment
Recently, I tried to watch two new shows on cable, Camelot and Game of Thrones, but I got turned off by all the un-necessary violence. I admit, I gave Camelot more of a shot. I watched six episodes(there were other turn-offs than just the violence). I only watched one episode of Game of Thrones**, but they killed three people in the first ten minutes and I lost interest fast. It's not like I can't appreciate dark shows. I loved Twin Peaks and I watched Reservoir Dogs multiple times back in the day. Two of my current favorite shows are True Blood and Dexter. But these shows all have strong characters and plots. The violence is used to move the story- not just thrown in for apparent shock value or because they can, which is what happens all too often these days. Movies and TV notoriously use tools such as sex, special effects and violence without any real discussion on whether they add to the story.
I don't like sounding like an old fogey, but I might have to go there to make my point. We used to get well-developed stories with interesting people doing interesting things. Now it seems like corporate owned-and-run Hollywood is just trying to find the perfect formula that will consistently sell their product. Such a shame that the industry who created wonderful films like E.T., Star Wars, Tootsie, Rambo(1st), The Godfather, Psycho, and Terms of Endearment makes us suffer through formulaic trash just because they are focusing solely on the business part of 'show business.'
And just because cable TV allows creativity to flourish without traditional restrictions, that doesn't mean channels like HBO, Showtime, and Starz should just fill their programming with violence, bad language, and sex, just because they can. Plot and character still matter. The Sex in 'Sex in the City' worked because the show was funny and the characters were well-developed. I couldn't imagine the show without the sex stuff. It was all part of the joke. But I didn't enjoy the cancelled Lucky Louie because, while it had moments, at the end of the day, the only differences between it and a lot of other sitcoms were the obscene language and subject matter. The Simpsons, Rosanne, and All In the Family were much better at cynical humor and they didn't need the vulgarity.
**I understand 'Thrones' was based on a series of books with strong characters and interesting plots, but I just can't sift through all the blood and boobs to give the HBO series a chance.
I don't like sounding like an old fogey, but I might have to go there to make my point. We used to get well-developed stories with interesting people doing interesting things. Now it seems like corporate owned-and-run Hollywood is just trying to find the perfect formula that will consistently sell their product. Such a shame that the industry who created wonderful films like E.T., Star Wars, Tootsie, Rambo(1st), The Godfather, Psycho, and Terms of Endearment makes us suffer through formulaic trash just because they are focusing solely on the business part of 'show business.'
And just because cable TV allows creativity to flourish without traditional restrictions, that doesn't mean channels like HBO, Showtime, and Starz should just fill their programming with violence, bad language, and sex, just because they can. Plot and character still matter. The Sex in 'Sex in the City' worked because the show was funny and the characters were well-developed. I couldn't imagine the show without the sex stuff. It was all part of the joke. But I didn't enjoy the cancelled Lucky Louie because, while it had moments, at the end of the day, the only differences between it and a lot of other sitcoms were the obscene language and subject matter. The Simpsons, Rosanne, and All In the Family were much better at cynical humor and they didn't need the vulgarity.
**I understand 'Thrones' was based on a series of books with strong characters and interesting plots, but I just can't sift through all the blood and boobs to give the HBO series a chance.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Drew Carey's Improv-A-Ganza
Those of you familiar with Drew Carey's old comedy/improv show "Whose Line Is It Anyway?," will recognize the format of this updated version on the Game Show Network.
Improv-a-ganza is filmed in Vegas at the MGM grand. The audience sits night club style, meaning unlike the old 'Whose Line' audience, they can eat and drink at tables(which makes it interesting when they pick volunteers who've had one too many!). Aesthetically it works better, but the sense of intimacy and the feeling that anything can happen is gone. I used to like when the cast would run into the audience during skits and involve the crowd. Now, due to the raised stage and enormously spread out seating, doing that is impractical, so the only time they are in the audience section is to pick out volunteers for their sketches.
I was glad to see most of the old cast from 'Whose Line' on the new show. Well, except for Greg Proops. Sorry, but he annoyed me on the old show, and he annoys me on this one. I find him the least funny of the players and he seems phony--like he is above the people he is entertaining; in contrast with the rest of the cast, who all seem to like their audience and people in general.
The cast is older now, of course, than they were on 'Whose Line' but still very on their game. Drew Carey has changed the most because of his massive weight loss. Jeff Davis has changed the least; he looks like he stepped out of a time machine.
It's hard to pick a favorite cast member, but top on my list is Colin Mochrie. Colin is hilarious and you never know what will come out of his mouth. The great thing about him is that he rarely breaks character. When he says something crazy, he'll have the rest of the cast in stitches, but he'll just keep right on going. I liked him better when he was on 'Whose Line,' but only because there was more of him. Sadly, he isn't in all the episodes of Improv-A-Ganza.
Wayne Brady is another bright spot, but unfortunately, he is in even fewer episodes of Improv-A-Ganza than Colin. Wayne is witty, has always connected well with people, and he's never afraid to laugh at himself. His warm personality oozes into everything he does. No wonder they gave him a talk show.
Ryan Stiles is terrific, of course, and I always enjoy Brad Sherwood and Chip Esten. I haven't had enough exposure to Heather Anne Campbell, but she seems okay. It would be nice to see Cathy Greenwood, though. Hopefully she'll guest in future episodes.
Newcomer Jonathan Magnum is terrific. I say newcomer, but he has a resume that goes back to the early nineties. His energy and enthusiasm led me to believe he was a twenty-something so I was shocked to discover he is 40 years old. He makes a great addition to the cast.
As for the format... The new show is more ensemble oriented. It may be Drew Carey's show, but he doesn't host it like he did the old one. The players all alternate hosting duties, which keeps it interesting, but also makes it less cohesive. The good thing is there are more players per episode so you get to see cast members mingle that you never got to see together in the old show. The bad thing is that because there are more players, it's harder to use everyone enough in the half hour show. Any chance of giving us an hour, Drew?
"Whose Line" seemed to move better because they fit more sketches in the half hour. If you didn't like one sketch, you didn't have long to wait for a different one. The new show only seems to do about three, maybe four sketches per episode and sometimes they drag on past funny. Most of the skits are similar to the ones on 'Whose Line,' but I miss Irish Drinking Song and the green screen stuff they used to do. I do not miss Three-headed Broadway Star, though, as I rarely found that one funny. Of the new sketches they've added, I like 'kick it' the best so far. This is where two players act out a scene, but have to break into rap whenever a third player tells them to. It's an upbeat, lively sketch that really showcases the wit of the players who can sing.
Improv-A-Ganza has only had one guest star so far-- Charlie Sheen. And they had to bleep most of what he said, so he was probably more enjoyable for the live audience. "Whose Line" used to have some great guests. In fact, some of the funniest episodes came from guest appearances. Who could forget Richard Simmons pretending to be a jet ski under Colin Mochrie? It might be harder to get guests on the new show because they aren't in Los Angeles, but hopefully they will try.
To sum it up, I will probably continue to watch Improv-A-Ganza because I like improv comedy and no one does it better than Drew and his cast. And if I miss the old show, I can still get my fix, as they air it every night on the Family Channel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)